I dont know - probably biblical role of women? Eve and the apple, all that stuff.
Or in Israel, women are not allowed to show their arms, for example - has nothing to do with women, it has to do with the fact that the men find it provocative and cant control themselves. So maybe that could also be the reason.
Muza dear :tiphat: and my very good friend Mat :tiphat:
I completely agree with you. We have to remember that in those days, while Jesus Christ was alive and even thousands of years prior to this event, the history shows that the society was a very macho built society. Women were not alowed to interact for instance in religious discussion, politics nor were women alowed to work outside the family (except prostitutes). They took care of the children from birth to the late teen age years and had slaves to help out cleaning the house and some minor agriculture work, if their husbands were important, even officers with the army.
Male children were what every father wanted first and foremost, this still goes for every other man in our world.
![Roll eyes :rolleyes: :rolleyes:]()
![Confused :confused: :confused:]()
:crazy:
![Smile :) :)]()
This is, what I personally find wrong to deny women, acording to the society we all live in today, where ambicious well educated women and feminists have decided years ago that they too have the right to make themselves a career through a long time education, make their own money to support either themselves and a couple of children as a single Mom or support the family.
There are more professors of the female gender today than ever before and more women in the CEC offices in huge corporations and women have fought to be able to represent their local community politically. This is called independence and responsability for the society, we live in and women have this right equally to men also to become politicians and senators. So the Roman Catholic Church, which do not have "any" legal influence in politics any more, do not have the right to deny women, what men have and they will have to change this idea that only men can be clergymen, because of out-dated rules from an old dusty book, written by macho´s.
According to the Bush-league and the ultra-right-wing christian crusadors and the old Testament´s prophecies, women should not be índependent this way. We know for instance that certain cults, but also certain religious groups spread across the entire USA, who believe in A WHITE AMERICA, that they live behind fences far from the cities, or like Waco Texas, or the Jim Jones New Society in South America, that they were ultra-right-wing-christian conservatives, who believe more in the "word" and the old Testament, that God created the world we all live in and that Darwinism - the evolution of Man are crap and a fantasy not approved of by the Old Testament, in their estimation.
Here for these groups,you will find that women mostly have the role of women more than 2000 years ago, at the same time these groups (more than 124 spread across the USA), do not have a regular income, but are highly violent and always are loaded with guns, plastic explosives and any other means and tools of a military attack or defence of their way of life, where all women are basicly 24/7 - mothers and wives.
I don´t believe any woman today having had a life of independence and a career of her own, having fought for the right against men in the USA and elsewhere to be able to vote, would sanction a life back within the four walls of a house or apartment only to be the servant of her man?
We all live in another very modern and progressive society in 2008 and in my best judgement, we can´t keep on dragging on the old ways of life up front. IMHO the death penalty as well as torture are left overs from the Old Testament equals
an eye for an eye, equally to the condescending of women, nor is it proper in a modern democratical society in 2008.
I find women in generel more honest than men, and I hate to see from time to time that some women to achieve a career have to be more men than men themself (equals cyniscism) to succeed.
I find all women no matter where they live better judges of most problems in life, and I would love to see 150 of mixed cultures and human skin colour more of them - in the US Congress and in every church.