Dorsetmike
Member
Or so the estate agent/realtor would say; yet a friend of mine in the property sales business says
Italics are mine
referring to this property on sale for £M3.5, 1960s 4 bedroom 2 bathrooms 3 living rooms (dining, lounge, study?) in somewhat dilapidated condition. turn through streetview to see surroundings then come out to satellite view.
Does the location make such a big difference? Buyers will probably demolish it and build a 3 storey place similar to adjacent ones, that should cost at least another £M1+. (Sandbanks is currently 5th most expensive property in the world after Manhattan, Hong Kong, Tokyo and London, this property sets a new record for Sandanks of £1725 per square foot)
https://www.google.com/maps?q=Sandb...=0CTWwqyRjHGrqyHpDyZcXg&cbp=12,135.79,,0,9.33
I can't quite see all the fuss about Sandbanks. Some big houses on small tree lined plots or flats with a rather mediocre view of ferries and the crowds paddling. No major commuter airport nearer than Southhampton (about 35miles), adequate (but no better than that) rail service to London and a poor service to the rest of the country. Bad road links thru the conurbation and beyond. What am I missing?
Italics are mine
referring to this property on sale for £M3.5, 1960s 4 bedroom 2 bathrooms 3 living rooms (dining, lounge, study?) in somewhat dilapidated condition. turn through streetview to see surroundings then come out to satellite view.
Does the location make such a big difference? Buyers will probably demolish it and build a 3 storey place similar to adjacent ones, that should cost at least another £M1+. (Sandbanks is currently 5th most expensive property in the world after Manhattan, Hong Kong, Tokyo and London, this property sets a new record for Sandanks of £1725 per square foot)
https://www.google.com/maps?q=Sandb...=0CTWwqyRjHGrqyHpDyZcXg&cbp=12,135.79,,0,9.33
Last edited: